The short answer
Both are production-grade, battle-tested relational databases that handle most web application workloads equally well. For new projects in 2026, PostgreSQL is the default choice — it has stronger SQL standards compliance, better JSON support, and more advanced features without meaningful downsides at most scales.
MySQL remains the right choice for: WordPress/PHP stacks, teams with deep MySQL expertise, existing MySQL databases you're extending, and hosting environments where MySQL is the only option.
Key differences
| Feature | MySQL | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| SQL standards compliance | Good — some non-standard extensions | Excellent — most standards-compliant RDBMS |
| JSON support | JSON type (stored as text internally) | JSONB (binary JSON — indexed, fast queries) |
| Full-text search | Basic — works for simple use cases | Advanced — custom dictionaries, ranking, stemming |
| Custom data types | Limited | Extensive — arrays, hstore, geometric types, custom |
| Window functions | Since MySQL 8.0 | Long-standing, fully featured |
| Replication | Excellent — mature, widely supported | Good — logical replication improved significantly |
| Ecosystem/hosting | Wider — supported everywhere | Good — all major cloud providers, Supabase, Neon |
Where PostgreSQL wins
JSONB for semi-structured data
PostgreSQL's JSONB column stores JSON in a binary format that can be indexed and queried efficiently. You can have relational data and document data in the same database:
-- Store flexible metadata in JSONB
CREATE TABLE products (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT NOT NULL,
metadata JSONB
);
-- Query with GIN index support
CREATE INDEX idx_products_metadata ON products USING GIN (metadata);
SELECT * FROM products WHERE metadata->>'color' = 'red';MySQL's JSON type stores data as text and validates JSON syntax, but doesn't support the same indexing capabilities as PostgreSQL's JSONB.
Advanced data types
PostgreSQL has native types that MySQL doesn't:
- Arrays:
TEXT[],INTEGER[]— store arrays without a join table - Range types:
tsrangefor date/time ranges — great for scheduling, availability - UUID: Native UUID type with efficient storage and indexing
- Geometric types:
POINT,CIRCLE,POLYGON— for GIS-adjacent use cases
Standards compliance saves migration pain
PostgreSQL follows the SQL standard closely. MySQL has historically taken liberties — GROUP BY behavior, implicit type coercions, and string comparison case-sensitivity differ from the standard. This matters when migrating between databases or writing portable queries.
Where MySQL wins
WordPress and PHP ecosystem
MySQL is the database for the WordPress/PHP/LAMP stack. If you're running WordPress, phpBB, Drupal, or most PHP applications, MySQL is the right choice — the ecosystem assumes it.
Simpler replication setup
MySQL's binary log-based replication is more mature and simpler to configure than PostgreSQL's replication setup. For read replicas and high-availability MySQL setups, the tooling (ProxySQL, Orchestrator) is more mature.
Wider hosting availability
Every shared hosting provider supports MySQL. PostgreSQL is available on all major cloud providers (AWS RDS, Google Cloud SQL, Azure) and modern platforms (Supabase, Neon, Railway) but is less universal in the shared hosting market.
The practical decision
Starting a new project? PostgreSQL. No meaningful downside and you get better JSON, better types, better standards compliance, and excellent managed hosting (Supabase free tier, Neon free tier, Railway).
Existing MySQL database or WordPress? Stay on MySQL. The migration cost outweighs the feature benefit for existing systems.
Format and debug SQL for either database with the free SQL formatter — it supports both MySQL and PostgreSQL syntax.
Related tools
- Free SQL Formatter — format MySQL and PostgreSQL queries instantly
- Free JSON Formatter — validate JSONB data before inserting into PostgreSQL
Written by Achraf A., founder of TheFreeAITools.